Tuesday, 31 May 2011

Please Value Compromise

If you can't go that extra mile meet someone halfway. Value compromise, but don't compromise your values. Life is not a smooth journey. It should not be. It is marked by ups and downs . people and situations move in and out of life . some are easy to handle while other are difficult to deal with .It is difficult ones that always come to us to test our abilities of how smoothly we manage to cope with them . With least resistance and friction offered in the effort.
                 We may not always get what we want . Does that mean we should not seek to get what we want ? Or rue over the fact that what set out to achieve is different from what we actually did?
               Disagreement occurs , not so much for want of agreement as to the lack of our desire to agree . Our entrenched disinclination disposes us not to agree to something or with someone that is half as good . When we say half as good, we presuppose the half as bad already . This conflict between half as good and half as bad holds us to back arrive at a solution with regard to people and situations that are not past resolve in themselves.
             When faced with people and situations caught in the spatio-temporal wrap , different from our own , we fail to see them in objective light. Our subjective thinking gets the better of us . As a result what's obvious to others is not so to us.
               The solution to resolve a deadlocked situation or parties involved in it exists outside this wrap. But for that to happen , people need to cede their stance.
           This ceding of position is not acceptance of defeat, or meek surrender . it is not something to be ashamed of or to feel conscious stricken about. Rather it is the brave attempt at surmounting the inflated sense of ego that comes in the way of us arriving at an agreement. it is a conscious choice.
            Adoption of such a way requires us to recognise others' point of view . We can start looking for merit in others' case only when we presume an element of demerit in ours . for truth is never absolute. We mistakenly chase the shadow and miss the image.
                     Compromise is intrinsic to nature's scheme of things to avoid resistance. when a fierce wind threatens to blow away and uproot all that comes in its path even the mighty tree , otherwise firmly standing , begins to sway and bends and bows.
                  The fury of wind doesn't last but the submissive bending of tree manages to see it through the rough patch. A blade of grass flattens itself against the swift current of water only to pop up its head when the current slackens .Nature uses this defence mechanism for survival .It also teaches us to live in harmony with one another and at peace with ourselves.
                  Nature provides us with the option of compromise as an effective means to achieve harmony and peace in times of personal conflicts and emotional turmoil and interpersonal clash and collective wars . We only need to wake up to the idea and bring it into play to attain peace within and outside.
                It is certainly not a big price , rather a welcome value addition in the objective evaluation of compromise . What are we waiting for?
                       
NOTE:- this is not my work .it is my favourite article from SPEAKING TREE(Times Of India)
                    

Monday, 30 May 2011

Thinking about new Chief

Christine Lagarde
Where does India resides in the developing world? Though India along with other BRIC nations opposed European nations support to Christine Lagarde as IMF chief after Dominique Strauss Kahn , But our voice is not strong enough . India must lead developing world . We must suggest a name for this post.Apart from that we must demand that all the contender must face all the question regarding the problems IMF is facing today ,otherwise Lagarde will win very easily. The way European united to support lagarde this all question remain unanswered .Their attitude did not depicts free , unprejudiced, transparent selection process. When world bank and IMF were established , world big economic powers select their leaders with a so called gentlemen agreement .European select IMF chief and Washington select World bank chief. This time European proudly interfering in the broader picture.
                              IMF is still stick to non disclosure clause . According to rules nominations for all the candidates will continue till 10 June ,those have impeccable record in forming economic policies , those have a professional background . Name of all the nominated candidates were presented to 24 member IMF executive board and they will select three of them .Then only the shortlist will be published .After that there will be voting is used to select the chief. European union and Switzerland have 8 out of 24 seats in IMF and combine with America  they have 13 votes. Apart from that German chancellor Angela Merkel declared lagarde extremely intelligent and experienced. Italy's Silvio Berlusconi said she is a great option. all other European speak in same tone. It is very sad see that international financial media become toy in the European hands financial times has logic that since IMF has most of the problems associated with Europe . Therefore chief must be from Europe. If this logic is correct then in 1997 IMF's France leader should resign to give his post to some Asian . Germany finance minister Shabel said that it is logical to have a European as IMF chief as Europe has highest share in IMF. If IMF and world bank are just corporate institution than it does not matter but they are also universal institution whose goal is to resolve matter regarding world finance. After Strauss Kahn the person who take his responsibility have to face so many problem Europe loan problem is just very small in front of them.
                     There are evidences that IMF had  been biased earlier under the leadership of Dominique .but Strauss Kahn and lagarde are different . On one side Kahn wanted to repair the damages due to Neo Liberal , on the other side lagarde is of center right front she is strict and declared that everyone have to work determined manner or she will made them do forcefully. Now having a strict biased and ardent believer of Neo liberal policies as a IMF chief is definitely not in the interest of India and other developing and developed nation.